Media Servers - Open Source

Category

Media Servers - Open Source

An open source media server is the engine that routes audio and video between participants in a WebRTC session. Most of these run as an SFU. At the heart of most self developed WebRTC infrastructure you are bound to find a media server - usually one of these.

My take

Start with Jitsi first - if it fits your use case and behavior - go with it - highly opinionated and highly optimized. LiveKit has the momentum. mediasoup was considered king (before LiveKit). Janus is the solid C option. OpenVidu I'd skip: if you're at that point, pick a Video API instead - though that might just be me.

Not sure which way to go?

This page tells you what AI sees. I can help you fit it to your call volume, your budget, and your team.

Get help picking your stack
Tool AI Visibility iHow often AI recommends this tool - the average of three model scores from 0 to 10: Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.6 Flash and GPT-5.6 Terra. The models disagree a lot here, which is the point. Quality iA measured score from 0 to 100, blending documentation depth (docs) and feature coverage (feat). Agent-ready iWhether the project ships something that lets an AI agent build with or operate it: an agent skill or MCP server (full), or just an llms.txt docs file (adjacent). Almost nobody here does. Popularity iRaw project reach, measured June 2026: GitHub stars and forks, plus weekly npm downloads where the tool ships a client package. Not composited into a score. Liveliness iHow active the repo is right now, measured June 2026: time since the last commit and the number of commits in the last 4 weeks. Tsahi's note
LiveKit
7.4avg
6.8
7.5
7.7
98
100%96%
Agent Skill + MCP
19.2kstars
2.1k forks2.1M npm/wk
today
43 commits / 4wk
Rising Star
mediasoup
5.8avg
6.3
5.4
5.7
71
82%60%
None
7.3kstars
1.2k forks30k npm/wk
3d ago
48 commits / 4wk
No call here - measured, not judged
Jitsi
5.7avg
5.6
5
6.4
84
89%80%
~Adjacent llms.txt (8x8)
29.4kstars
7.9k forks
today
64 commits / 4wk
All-in-One
Janus
4.5avg
4.2
4.5
4.9
81
82%80%
None
9.1kstars
2.6k forks
8d ago
4 commits / 4wk
The C Lib
OpenVidu
0.9avg
0.7
0.9
1.1
91
93%90%
~Product llms.txt
2.1kstars
482 forks5.0k npm/wk
4d ago
23 commits / 4wk
No call here - measured, not judged
Documentation depth Feature coverage Claude Sonnet 5 Gemini 3.6 Flash GPT-5.6 Terra

MEASURED

  • Project health (stars, forks, npm, commits) was pulled from GitHub and npm in June 2026. These figures move daily
  • AI Visibility and Quality come from my evaluation runs in the same window

None of that is a score. It's a recommendation. The grades on this page measure the machines, not my opinion of the vendors.

Run a tool that belongs here? I add and re-score tools as the ecosystem moves. Review your tool