Does WebRTC need a change in governance?
Is it time to change the governance of WebRTC in order to keep it growing and flourishing?
Read MoreWhy buy into legacy?
Last week, Cisco made another acquisition in the WebRTC space. This time, Cisco acquired Acano. Acano is a rather new company that started life in 2012 - close to WebRTC's announcement.
Acano makes use of WebRTC, though I am not sure to what extent. There are 2 reasons Cisc lists for this acquisition:
To me, scalability comes from thinking of video conferencing in the mindset of WebRTC - WebRTC services are mostly cloud based and built to scale (or at least should be). Old video conferencing models thought at the scale of a single company at best, with business models fitting the high end of the market only.
That brings me to why. Why is Cisco buying into legacy here?
If there's anything that is interesting these days it is what happens in the realm of messaging. And for Cisco, this should mean Enterprise Messaging. I already stated earlier this year that Enterprise Messaging is a threat to Unified Communications.
Don't believe me? How about these interesting moves:
Which brings me back to the question.
Why buy into legacy? At scale. With interoperability. Using fresh technology. But legacy nonetheless.
Why not go after Slack and just acquire it outright?
When Cisco wanted a piece of video conferencing, they didn't acquire RADVISION - its main supplier at the time. It went after TANDBERG - the market leader.
Then why this time not buy the market leader of enterprise messaging and just get on with it?
Congrats to the Acano team on being acquired.
For Cisco, though, I think the challenges lie elsewhere.
Is it time to change the governance of WebRTC in order to keep it growing and flourishing?
Read MoreRTC@Scale is Facebook’s virtual WebRTC event, covering current and future topics. Here’s the summary for RTC@Scale 2024 so you can pick and choose the relevant ones for you.
Read More