Would WebRTC be as Big a Thing if it Didn't Run in a Web Browser?

Probably not.
I wrote about Peer-to-Peer and WebRTC recently, and got this interesting question due to it from Fabian Bernhard on LinkedIn:
Without arguing about the quality of a specific Open Source media stack, would you say that WebRTC was as big a thing if it didn't run in a web browser?I guess the answer is no it wouldn't be that big a thing. Here's where I am getting at it. There are two popular slides I usually use:


Mobile might be different
For mobile only use cases, WebRTC would have made all the difference - same as it does today. The idea behind it in mobile isn't that it offers a browser experience or that it is available in the browser (it isn't on iOS). The idea is that it would have been the cheapest route to a product than anything else out there. And with the trend of communications moving in-app, that would still make the impact it does there relevant. Which brings us full circle. Let's assume mobile is eating up the world. Let's assume it is only a matter of time until content creation and not only content consumption moves from the PC to mobile. Once that happens - who cares about what happens in the browser? It will all be in-app anyway. And there - WebRTC is making a difference.
Need to know where WebRTC is available? Download this free WebRTC Device Cheat Sheet.


the biggest difference to what we did not have a free media engine combined with an excellent networking stack that is maintained by a fairly large dedicated team.
Now for how long it makes sense for Google to maintain that team...