7 Reasons for WebRTC Server-Side Media Processing

June 6, 2014

My whitepaper on server-side media processing, sponsored by Dialogic.

Server side media processing for WebRTC

WebRTC is a great technology. It fixes a lot of the ailments of what came before it in media processing for VoIP. That said, it comes as a nice client-side package for browsers but nothing more.

This leaves a lot to be desired for some – there are things that can only be done on the server side; especially things around media processing.

Dialogic were kind enough to give me a freehand to write a whitepaper on this exact topic – what are the things in WebRTC that require server-side media processing. I came up with 7 reasons. The whitepaper is freely available on Dialogic’s website: 7 reasons for WebRTC server-side media processing

Go read it and tell me what you think.

 


You may also like

WebRTC predictions for 2023

WebRTC predictions for 2023
Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

  1. Quite a good intro. If prefer “SFU” for what you call router, but that is just because I have a favorite one.

    And since I can’t read papers or specs without finding an error: page 8 — chrome at least can do 1080p.

  2. Yeh, a good paper that covers most use cases.
    What mediaserver would you recommend for server-side processing?

    1. I’d recommend Dialogic – they sponsored this whitepaper 🙂

      Seriously, it all depends on the technical requirements and the business needs/constraints that you have.

      If you are looking for a free, open source solution; then many vendors I’ve seen are tinkering with Jitsi VideoBridge or exploring Janus. Also take a look at Kurento.

      If what you need is a commercial solution with an SLA attached, then Dialogic is definitely a choice to consider.

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}